Scribe SEO Reviews Your on Page Optimization
June 3rd, 2011
Payday Loan
A payday loan, described as a paycheck advance or possibly a cash advance, serves as a comparatively small, short-term loan thats generally created to cover quite a few expenses which your consumer has right up until the individual’s following wages. Most short-term lending options can also be on occasion well-known or perhaps even referenced to as a cash advance, even while that term might apply to cash taken towards a prearranged personal line of credit as an example your current house property value or even credit card. So that you can read more about qualifying and obtaining a new payday loan, give us a call at (415)365-2900 or simply visit us at CashAdvanceForMe.com.
Chicago
Chicago flights can be difficult to obtain if you wait too long, especially if you are shopping for a great price. However, you can make use of sites that put forward cut-rate Chicago flights no matter what time you choose to assemble your planning. While you might yet save more the faster you decide to book your Chicago flights, you should at least see some stage of financial savings even if you wait until there is little time left. Using such sites to acquire Chicago flights is at times much more time efficient versus going from airline to airline as they will hunt all of them for you routinely and then locate the best availability and the best fee on all Chicago flights matching your explanation.
Scribe SEO Reviews
Scribe SEO Reviews - Scribe SEO concentrates about three sectors for SEO: Keyword phrases, Articles and other content in addition to Backlinks. Check out Scribe SEO Reviews for more info. When you log straight into the back end on the web site, this amazing service should have an area labeled as “Scribe Keyword Research” inside the area you may write what precisely your web site subject matter or perhaps blog content is concerning and Scribe can offer you a report involving keyword strategies and also number of site visitors which means that that an individual can certainly discover how popular is a search phrase. There are lots of good Scribe SEO reviews of which you can point to. Scribe SEO reviews your articles and can provide a grade driven by 15 Search engine optimization principals to ensure that your content regularly can be uncovered quickly by way of the search engines. Scribe SEO has a linking tool designed to point you to internet sites in which you should receive links. Check out Scribe SEO reviews today.
A Lesson Apropos WildBlue Satellite
August 29th, 2010
Entertainment used to be all about television sets, radio sets and game systems. That was all altered with the creation of the internet. Oregon’s ISP WildBlue fetches fresh entertainment right to your screen with super-fast file transfer speeds of up to 30 times faster than dial up. Actual speeds may vary.
WildBlue makes it feasible for you to browse the internet and visit all your preferred web pages. Keep track of current news reports at places such as CNN.com, visit your friends on Myspace or Facebook, listen to audio files, play games and do whatever else you want to do. Stuck for programs? The internet is where you’ll find them. There are thousands of distinct applications to opt for including costless word processors, conversion calculators and thesauri. Wouldn’t you like to find more acquaintances? If you join WildBlue internet you can make acquaintances from all over the world. Social networking web pages such as Twitter or Facebook and video sharing web pages such as YouTube are hugely popular at the moment. Don’t miss out. Lots of internet browsers use social bookmarking web pages to find out what the current fashionable internet craze is. Is keeping an online journal a priority? There are lots of web pages you can use. If you want a good discussion then sign up to some webforums. So many individuals use WildBlue and find exciting music. With applications such as iTunes, you too can do it too. Stream killer songs while avoiding the album’s fillers. Beyond music, these kinds of web pages often offer films, podcasts, audiobooks and many other digital wares you can savor practically everywhere with satellite internet. If you missed an installment of your favorite tv drama or you have a desire to watch a film but don’t want to drive to the video shop, WildBlue internet lets you watch the shows you want in your home. Get online with WildBlue and have fun downloading tv and films from both free and paid web pages. It’s well known that online gaming is the latest craze, anyone can join the fun, even you! At the most basic level, you can choose from MMORPGs and web pages that provide card, puzzle and adventure games. Often, they are offered completely free of charge.
There’s an astonishing choice, so isn’t it about time you joined up with a first-rate wireless internet provider? If you require an inexpensive and highly dependable ISP and you’ve got an open view of the southern sky, look no further than WildBlue.
The Economics of Spam
May 31st, 2010
Tennessee resident K. C. “Khan” Smith owes the internet service provider EarthLink $24 million. According to the CNN, in August 2001 he was slapped with a lawsuit accusing him of violating federal and state Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) statutes, the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1984, the federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 and numerous other state laws. On July 19, 2002 - having failed to appear in court - the judge ruled against him. Mr. Smith is a spammer.
Brightmail, a vendor of e-mail filters and anti-spam applications warned that close to 5 million spam “attacks” or “bursts” occurred in June 2002 and that spam has mushroomed 450 percent since June 2001. This pace continued unabated well into the beginning of 2004 when the introduction of spam filters began to take effect. PC World concurs.
Between one half and three quarters of all e-mail messages are spam or UCE (Unsolicited Commercial Email) - unsolicited and intrusive commercial ads, mostly concerned with sex, scams, get rich quick schemes, financial services and products, and health articles of dubious provenance. The messages are sent from spoofed or fake e-mail addresses. Some spammers hack into unsecured servers - mainly in China and Korea - to relay their missives anonymously.
Starting in 2003, malicious hackers began using spam to install malware - such as viruses, adware, spyware, and Trojans - on the unprotected personal computers of less savvy users. They thus transform these computers into “zombies”, organize them into spam-spewing “bots” (networks), and sell access to them to criminals on penumbral boards and forums all over the Net.
Spam is an industry. Mass e-mailers maintain lists of e-mail addresses, often “harvested” by spamware bots - specialized computer applications - from Web sites. These lists are rented out or sold to marketers who use bulk mail services. They come cheap - c. $100 for 10 million addresses. Bulk mailers provide servers and bandwidth, charging c. $300 per million messages sent.
As spam recipients become more inured, ISPs less tolerant, and both more litigious - spammers multiply their efforts in order to maintain the same response rate. Spam works. It is not universally unwanted - which makes it tricky to outlaw. It elicits between 0.1 and 1 percent in positive follow ups, depending on the message. Many messages now include HTML, JavaScript, and ActiveX coding and thus resemble (or actually contain) viruses and Trojans.
Jupiter Media Matrix predicted in 2001 that the number of spam messages annually received by a typical Internet user will double to 1400 and spending on legitimate e-mail marketing will reach $9.4 billion by 2006 - compared to $1 billion in 2001. Forrester Research pegs the number at $4.8 billion in 2003.
More than 2.3-5 billion spam messages are sent daily. eMarketer puts the figures a lot lower at 76 billion messages in 2002. By 2006, daily spam output will soar to c. 15 billion missives, says Radicati Group. Jupiter projects a more modest 268 billion annual messages this year (2005). An average communication costs the spammer 0.00032 cents.
PC World quotes the European Union as pegging the bandwidth costs of spam worldwide in 2002 at $8-10 billion annually. Other damages include server crashes, time spent purging unwanted messages, lower productivity, aggravation, and increased cost of Internet access.
Inevitably, the spam industry gave rise to an anti-spam industry. According to a Radicati Group report titled “Anti-virus, anti-spam, and content filtering market trends 2002-2006″, anti-spam revenues were projected to exceed $88 million in 2002 - and more than double by 2006. List blockers, report and complaint generators, advocacy groups, registers of known spammers, and spam filters all proliferate. The Wall Street Journal reported in its June 25, 2002 issue about a resurgence of anti-spam startups financed by eager venture capital.
ISPs are bent on preventing abuse - reported by victims - by expunging the accounts of spammers. But the latter simply switch ISPs or sign on with free services like Hotmail and Yahoo! Barriers to entry are getting lower by the day as the costs of hardware, software, and communications plummet.
The use of e-mail and broadband connections by the general population is spreading. Hundreds of thousands of technologically-savvy operators have joined the market in the last five years, as the dotcom bubble burst. Still, Steve Linford of the UK-based Spamhaus.org insists that most spam emanates from c. 80 large operators.
Now, according to Jupiter Media, ISPs and portals are poised to begin to charge advertisers in a tier-based system, replete with premium services. Writing back in 1998, Bill Gates described a solution also espoused by Esther Dyson, chair of the Electronic Frontier Foundation:
“As I first described in my book ‘The Road Ahead’ in 1995, I expect that eventually you’ll be paid to read unsolicited e-mail. You’ll tell your e-mail program to discard all unsolicited messages that don’t offer an amount of money that you’ll choose. If you open a paid message and discover it’s from a long-lost friend or somebody else who has a legitimate reason to contact you, you’ll be able to cancel the payment. Otherwise, you’ll be paid for your time.”
Subscribers may not be appreciative of the joint ventures between gatekeepers and inbox clutterers. Moreover, dominant ISPs, such as AT&T and PSINet have recurrently been accused of knowingly collaborating with spammers. ISPs rely on the data traffic that spam generates for their revenues in an ever-harsher business environment.
The Financial Times and others described how WorldCom refuses to ban the sale of spamware over its network, claiming that it does not regulate content. When “pink” (the color of canned spam) contracts came to light, the implicated ISPs blame the whole affair on rogue employees.
PC World begs to differ:
“Ronnie Scelson, a self-described spammer who signed such a contract with PSInet, (says) that backbone providers are more than happy to do business with bulk e-mailers. ‘I’ve signed up with the biggest 50 carriers two or three times’, says Scelson … The Louisiana-based spammer claims to send 84 million commercial e-mail messages a day over his three 45-megabit-per-second DS3 circuits. ‘If you were getting $40,000 a month for each circuit’, Scelson asks, ‘would you want to shut me down?’”
The line between permission-based or “opt-in” e-mail marketing and spam is getting thinner by the day. Some list resellers guarantee the consensual nature of their wares. According to the Direct Marketing Association’s guidelines, quoted by PC World, not responding to an unsolicited e-mail amounts to “opting-in” - a marketing strategy known as “opting out”. Most experts, though, strongly urge spam victims not to respond to spammers, lest their e-mail address is confirmed.
But spam is crossing technological boundaries. Japan has just legislated against wireless SMS spam targeted at hapless mobile phone users. Many states in the USA as well as the European parliament have followed suit. Ideas regarding a “do not spam” list akin to the “do not call” list in telemarketing have been floated. Mobile phone users will place their phone numbers on the list to avoid receiving UCE (spam). Email subscribers enjoy the benefits of a similar list under the CAN-Spam Act of 2003.
Expensive and slow connections make mobile phone spam and spim (instant messaging spam) particularly resented. Still, according to Britain’s Mobile Channel, a mobile advertising company quoted by “The Economist”, SMS advertising - a novelty - attracts a 10-20 percent response rate - compared to direct mail’s 1-3 percent.
Net identification systems - like Microsoft’s Passport and the one proposed by Liberty Alliance - will make it even easier for marketers to target prospects.
The reaction to spam can be described only as mass hysteria. Reporting someone as a spammer - even when he is not - has become a favorite pastime of vengeful, self-appointed, vigilante “cyber-cops”. Perfectly legitimate, opt-in, email marketing businesses and discussion forums often find themselves in one or more black lists - their reputation and business ruined.
In January 2002, CMGI-owned Yesmail was awarded a temporary restraining order against MAPS - Mail Abuse Prevention System - forbidding it to place the reputable e-mail marketer on its Real-time Blackhole list. The case was settled out of court.
Harris Interactive, a large online opinion polling company, sued not only MAPS, but ISPs who blocked its email messages when it found itself included in MAPS’ Blackhole. Their CEO accused one of their competitors for the allegations that led to Harris’ inclusion in the list.
Coupled with other pernicious phenomena - such as viruses, Trojans, and spyware - the very foundation of the Internet as a fun, relatively safe, mode of communication and data acquisition is at stake.
Spammers, it emerges, have their own organizations. NOIC - the National Organization of Internet Commerce threatened to post to its Web site the e-mail addresses of millions of AOL members. AOL has aggressive anti-spamming policies. “AOL is blocking bulk email because it wants the advertising revenues for itself (by selling pop-up ads)” the president of NOIC, Damien Melle, complained to CNET.
Spam is a classic “free rider” problem. For any given individual, the cost of blocking a spammer far outweighs the benefits. It is cheaper and easier to hit the “delete” key. Individuals, therefore, prefer to let others do the job and enjoy the outcome - the public good of a spam-free Internet. They cannot be left out of the benefits of such an aftermath - public goods are, by definition, “non-excludable”. Nor is a public good diminished by a growing number of “non-rival” users.
Such a situation resembles a market failure and requires government intervention through legislation and enforcement. The FTC - the US Federal Trade Commission - has taken legal action against more than 100 spammers for promoting scams and fraudulent goods and services.
“Project Mailbox” is an anti-spam collaboration between American law enforcement agencies and the private sector. Non government organizations have entered the fray, as have lobbying groups, such as CAUCE - the Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail.
But, a few recent anti-spam and anti-spyware Acts notwithstanding, Congress is curiously reluctant to enact stringent laws against spam. Reasons cited are free speech, limits on state powers to regulate commerce, avoiding unfair restrictions on trade, and the interests of small business. The courts equivocate as well. In some cases - e.g., Missouri vs. American Blast Fax - US courts found “that the provision prohibiting the sending of unsolicited advertisements is unconstitutional”.
According to Spamlaws.com, the 107th Congress, for instance, discussed these laws but never enacted them:
Unsolicited Commercial Electronic Mail Act of 2001 (H.R. 95), Wireless Telephone Spam Protection Act (H.R. 113), Anti-Spamming Act of 2001 (H.R. 718), Anti-Spamming Act of 2001 (H.R. 1017), Who Is E-Mailing Our Kids Act (H.R. 1846), Protect Children From E-Mail Smut Act of 2001 (H.R. 2472), Netizens Protection Act of 2001 (H.R. 3146), “CAN SPAM” Act of 2001 (S. 630).
Anti-spam laws fared no better in the 106th Congress. Some of the states have picked up the slack. Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.
The situation is no better across the pond. The European parliament decided in 2001 to allow each member country to enact its own spam laws, thus avoiding a continent-wide directive and directly confronting the communications ministers of the union. Paradoxically, it also decided, in March 2002, to restrict SMS spam. Confusion clearly reigns. Finally, in May 2002, it adopted strong anti-spam provisions as part of a Directive on Data Protection.
Responding to this unfavorable legal environment, spam is relocating to developing countries, such as Malaysia, Nepal, and Nigeria. In a May 2005 report, the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) warned that these countries lack the technical know-how and financial resources (let alone the will) to combat spam. Their users, anyhow deprived of bandwidth, endure, as a result, a less reliable service and an intermittent access to the Internet;
“Spam is a much more serious issue in developing countries…as it is a heavy drain on resources that are scarcer and costlier in developing countries than elsewhere” - writes the report’s author, Suresh Ramasubramanian, an OECD advisor and postmaster for Outblaze.com.
ISPs, spam monitoring services, and governments in the rich industrialized world react by placing entire countries - such as Macedonia and Costa Rica - on black lists and, thus denying access to their users en bloc.
International collaboration against the looming destruction of the Internet by crime organizations is budding. The FTC had just announced that it will work with its counterparts abroad to cut zombie computers off the network. A welcome step - but about three years late. Spammers the world over are still six steps ahead and are having the upper hand.
Sam Vaknin ( samvak.tripod.com ) is the author of Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited and After the Rain - How the West Lost the East. He served as a columnist for Global Politician, Central Europe Review, PopMatters, Bellaonline, and eBookWeb, a United Press International (UPI) Senior Business Correspondent, and the editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in The Open Directory and Suite101.
Until recently, he served as the Economic Advisor to the Government of Macedonia.
Visit Sam’s Web site at samvak.tripod.com
How to Get Noticed at Job Fairs
January 28th, 2010
Standing out at a Career Fair can make a difference in your search. Career Faires are starting to pick up, and a major job search company is running some nice ones, called Targeted Job Fairs. At a SF Bay Area Career Faire in January, 10 companies as showing up, and Dice has 82 career faires scheduled for 2010 across the US.
How do you compete at a Career Faire? The competition can be considerable, but you can help yourself stick out from the herd with early planning. At AA-Careers, we have a simple six-step process to prepare. Plan to go? Here’s how to prepare:
First, investigate the organizations that are going and pick your objectives. Use the internet to check out the organizations that are there before you even decide to go. Go to their internet sites and see if they have their openings posted. Pick a sane number to target, and get ready to spend an hour researching each one. It’s hard to do more than 8 in a day, and five or six is a much more reasonable target. For each hiring organization, you want to know: key product lines, recent news, and executive names. Try to see if you know anyone at the target companies. You will end up with with a page or two of research for each company/job.
Second, if there are job openings on the web, read them to see what the hiring department is looking for. Create a mapping of your achievements and skills to the demands of the job. Make the language match. If the hiring company calls customers "clients", your resume should do the same thing. The accomplishments should be written in the style of the hiring company.
Third, create a ‘brief sales pitch’ for each likely company/job combination. Write down a sixty second ‘thumbnail’ that you can repeat verbally showing why you are a good prospect for that position. You’ll use this in your resume and when you meet the company at the job kiosk.
Fourth, modify your resume for each opportunity. The objective on your resume should exactly match the job you’re aiming for. The executive summary should be a written form of your “mini sales pitch” for the job. Then choose the accomplishments and skills that most clearly match the job requirements. Especially at a Career Fair, the purpose of your resume is a sales tool for you – to get you on-site job interviews. It should be a no-brainer to see that you’re a match based on your resume.
Fifth, dress and prepare as if you’re doing on-site interviews. Dress well and be properly groomed. Don’t over do-it (this isn’t a date!) and don’t underdress (no jeans or t-shirts, no matter how much you paid for them). Avoid strong cologne or perfume.
Finally, rehearse your ‘mini-sales-pitch’. Collect your research and the resume for each position - bring a couple of copies for each – and put each in a distinctly marked folder. Keep them in a light briefcase or folio.
Remember to smile, and good hunting!